Drawing for MAGIC ARROW

USPTO serial 76534749

MAGIC ARROW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGIC ARROW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming machines and operational computer software thereforABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Aug 9, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 8, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 8, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance