USPTO serial 76535054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Fox
Jada Toys, Inc.938 Hatcher Ave.City of Industry, CA 91748UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, silver and gold jewelry, jewelry made of precious metals and stones, bracelets, earrings, rings, necklaces, toe rings, cufflinks, tie tacks, pins, watches, watchbands, and belt buckles of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, stickers, decals, writing paper, sticker albums, paper name badges, printed paper signs, pictures, posters, and publications, namely, magazines, books, newsletters, catalogs, and newsletters, in the fields of toys, automobiles, and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |