USPTO serial 76535582
CARATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3779642Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2010
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa L. Heywood
Melissa L. Heywood Accupro Trademark Services LLP702 - 401 West Georgia StreetVancouver, BC, V6B5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Semi-precious and precious gems; Gold, platinum and silver; Jewellery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2004 |
| 035 | Operation of a business dealing in the sale of semi-precious and precious gems, gold, silver and platinum for others; Mail order services featuring jewellery; Computerized on-line ordering services in the field of jewellery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2004 |
| 036 | Brokerage services in the field of semi-precious and precious gems, gold, silver and platinum; Financial valuation of personal property, namely, jewellery, semi-precious and precious gemstones, gold, silver and platinum | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2004 |
| 042 | Custom jewellery design; Providing online information in the field of mining and exploration of semi-precious and precious gems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARATS INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARATS INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DDI DIAMONDS DIRECT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARATS INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CARATS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 20, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 27, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |