USPTO serial 76539295
DONATELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DONATELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara Z. Morrissey
Barbara Z. Morrissey FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring cups, measuring spoons, scales | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Cookbooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hand operated instruments and tools for cooking or serving food, namely hand operated coffee grinders, salt and pepper mills; dinnerware; glassware; cookware, namely pots, pans, skillets, mixing bowls; and cooking utensils namely, graters for household purposes, cutting boards, spice racks, spatulas, whisks, serving tongs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of ongoing television program in the field of cooking and culinary arts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arpaia, Donatella
- Other trademarks owned by Arpaia, Donatella
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DONATELLA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |