Drawing for MAGICFORK

USPTO serial 76541674

MAGICFORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGICFORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas McPherson

Howard S. Michael Brinks Hofer Gilson & LioneP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic hardware enabling real time calculation of calories, weight, temperature or other propertiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 14, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 1, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 15, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 15, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 15, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance