Drawing for @LANTIC CITY

USPTO serial 76548989

@LANTIC CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with @LANTIC CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Stephen Harris

MARCUS STEPHEN HARRIS MARCUS STEPHEN HARRIS LLC3500 CHASE PLZ10 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sleepwear, bathing suits, pants; socks, shorts, hats, caps, sweatbandsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 15, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 15, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 15, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 15, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED
May 17, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance