USPTO serial 76549711
KAHUNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KAHUNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Danehill, Reading, GB
LOWER EARLEY, READING, BERKSHIRE, GB
NEWBURY, BERKSHIRE, GB
GRASS VALLEY, CA, GB
Twickenham, Middlesex TW1 1RQ, GB
Twickenham, Middlesex TW1 1RQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luna M. Samman
Luna M. Samman Arent Fox LLP1717 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic Video, audio and image signal processing apparatus namely, signal testers, monitors, converters, processors, encoders, decoders, signal generators, analyzers, video tape players, screen optimizers, noise reducers, switchers, routers, correctors, synchronizers, amplifiers, serializers and deserializers, digital video effects processors; electronic apparatus for use in the capture, production, post-production, conversion, recording, retrieval, distribution, playout and broadcast of television material, namely, antennas, transmitters, encoders, decoders, receivers, amplifiers, converters, monitors, modulators and demodulators, mixers, equalizers, signal generators, synchronizers, time-based correctors, color correctors, noise reducers, test pattern generators, electronic signal compression apparatus, oscillators and filters; electronic video communications apparatus, namely, video signal processors, video processors, video recorders, and video reproduction equipment, namely video cameras, televisions, and video monitors; electronic audio and video apparatus for domestic use, namely, television receivers, televisions, video monitors, video players, video displays, video display optimisers, DVD players and CD players; electronic display processing apparatus, namely, video signal converters for the purposes of display in a television; software for the purpose of converting video signals to display in a television; television standards converters; electronic apparatus for the transfer of film material to video; electronic apparatus and software for use in film post production; electronic apparatus and software for the generation, storage, modification and playing of test patterns and test signals, amplifiers, buffers, distributors, routers, switchers, mixers, serializers, deserializers, analyzers, monitors, standards converters, up-converters, down-converters, cross-converters, aspect-ratio-converters, editors, converters, time base correctors, synchronizers, color encoders, color decoders, color correctors, translators, pre-processors, post-processors, multiplexes, de-multiplexers, electronic apparatus for storing picture, video or audio information, audio inserters, audio extractors, recorders and noise reducers, all for use with video, picture or audio signals, whether compressed, partially compressed or uncompressed; electronic apparatus and software for compression encoding, compression decoding, transcoding, partial encoding or partial decoding of picture, video or audio signals; electronic apparatus and software for the generation of digital effects in film or video; electronic apparatus and software for use in the removal of artefacts from film or video; electronic apparatus for the restoration of film and video archives and for the management and retrieval of film and video archives; computer operating software, and tapes and discs featuring computer operating software, all for use in operating and controlling the functions of electronic video, audio and image signal processing apparatus; integrated circuits, circuit boards, and electronic sub-assemblies for use with the foregoing apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Snell & Wilcox Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SNELL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SNELL ADVANCED MEDIA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GRASS VALLEY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Snell & Wilcox Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Snell & Wilcox Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named KAHUNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 6, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 1, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |