USPTO serial 76553588
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Clovis Capital Management, L.P.
New York, NY
Clovis Capital Management, L.P.
New York, NY
Clovis Capital Management, L.P.
New York, NY
Clovis Capital Management, L.P.
New York, NY
Clovis Capital Management, L.P.
New York, NY
Clovis Capital Management, L.P.
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth A. Evert
Elisabeth A. Evert HITCHCOCK EVERT LLPP.O. BOX 131709DALLAS, TX 75313-1709UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing investment strategy information, analysis and management services for others; financial investments for others; hedge fund investment and management services for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 23, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 11, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |