Drawing for EAT FISH

USPTO serial 76558475

EAT FISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3209884Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EAT FISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT R. REID

SCOTT R REID21650 WEST ELEVEN MILE ROADSUITE 200SOUTHFIELD, MI 48076

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025[ shirts, T shirts, pants, coats, overalls, sweaters, jackets and vests ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 7, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Aug 6, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 11, 2012PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Jul 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 19, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 4, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 4, 2010CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
May 13, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 14, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Oct 17, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance