USPTO serial 76560004
WIBBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIBBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Freestone, CA
SEBASTOPOL, CA
SEBASTOPOL, CA
SEBASTOPOL, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES G. GATTO
JAMES G GATTO PILLSBURRY WINTHROP LLP1600 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102-4865UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tek Toys Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TWIBBLES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WIBBLES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WIBBLES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WIBBLES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |