USPTO serial 76567619
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Nagle, Jr.
David W. Nagle, Jr. Stites & Harbison, PLLC400 West Market St.Suite 1800Louisville, KY 40202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | [ interlocking floor tiles made of vinyl, rubber, polyurethane, plastic and PVC; non-metal stair treads; stair tread nosing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ boot trays, namely, trays for boots and shoes ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | floor coverings, namely, rugs; floor mats; precut runners, roll runners; vinyl floor runners | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |