USPTO serial 76570385
EDM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3094645Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2006
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EDM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arcadia, CA
Arcadia, CA
Arcadia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Lee
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | manually operated metal valves; metal pipe couplings; metal connectors for pipe and tubes; metal tube fittings; metal pipe fittings; metal couplings for air manifold systems comprising metal valves and metal fluid seals; metal couplings for liquid manifold systems comprising metal valves and metal fluid seals; metal tubing; metal tube inserts; metal sampling cylinders for gases and liquids sold empty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2002 |
| 007 | Mechanical and air operated metal valves for use in inlet control valves for regulating the flow of air, gas, or liquid for equipments namely Compressed Air Cooling and Moisture Separation Equipment; Non-Contact Cooling Water and Machine Water Cooling Equipments; Cooling Tower Filtration Equipments; Direct Steam Injection Equipments; Spray Drying and Powder Production Equipments; Direct Steam Injection Equipments; Bulk Powder Discharge Systems; Large and Small Diameter Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers; Plate-and-Frame Heat Exchanger; Air Cooled Heat Exchangers; Packaged Fired Heater Systems; Heat Exchangers; Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers; Oil-Fired Heaters; Water Softening equipments; Water Filtration Equipments; Fluid Strainer; Air Filtration System; Water blasting equipments; propane equipments; steam heater equipments; gas storage equipments; air, gas, and liquid pumping equipments; pressurized regulating equipments; compressor equipments; gas regulating equipments; power generating equipments; butane equipments; natural gas equipments; and compressed natural gas equipments used in Petro Chemical Industry, commercial propane and commercial butane industry, Liquefied Natural Gas Industry, Compressed Natural Gas Industry, and Power industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 23, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |