USPTO serial 76571933
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Antonio, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Hosting the websites and hosting of digital content of others on computer servers for computer networks, local area networks, wide area networks, private networks and the Internet; providing hosting services for the websites and digital content of resellers who host the websites, data, email, audio, video, graphics and content of others on computer servers for computer networks, local area networks, wide area networks, private networks and the Internet;computer services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for configuring, monitoring and managing computer servers, computer networks and network connections, as well as the storage, transmission and manipulation of digital content; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in business management in the nature of application hosting and web hosting services; computer services, namely, managing the configuration,setup, operation and availability of computer networks, network hardware and software, routing equipment, computer server hardware and software for use by others; providing network security, load balancing, error identification and error resolution for computer networks, network hardware and software, routing equipment, computer server hardware and software for use by others; providing network monitoring, computer server port monitoring, load balancing, electronic back up and recovery of computer data, and network security; registration of domain names for identification of users on the Internet; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; computer hardware and software consultation; consulting services in the field of hosting computer platforms; consultation in the configuration, operation and maintenance of computer server hardware and software, network hardware and software, computer server and computer network security systems, load balancers and computer data storage, backup and recovery; on-line technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |