USPTO serial 76575115
GIRL ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIRL ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women, and children, namely folk costumes, wraps,scarves, pants, trousers, shirts, T-shirts, skirts, blouses, blazers, jeans dresses, corsets, tops, jackets, coats, sweaters, turtlenecks, jerseys, vests,socks, sweatshirts, gloves, slacks, suits, pajamas, lingerie, suspenders,swimsuits, belts; neckwear including ties, bolos and bowties; underwear clothing; footwear, namely athletic shoes, ballet shoes beach shoes, canvas shoes, golf shoes, gymnastic shoes, leather shoes, rubber shoes, soccer shoes, track and field shoes, tennis shoes, work shoes, sneakers, boots, clogs,sandals, galoshes, and waders, shoes, Polish mountain shoes; underwear,namely children's, women's, and men's underwear, underpants, boxer shorts, pantyhose, bras, briefs, camisoles, thongs underwear, underwear clothing, thermal underwear, knitted underwear, disposable underwear;headwear, namely hats, caps, berets, visors, and hoods; Polish headwear from the mountain area | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions in the field of clothes,shoes and headwear; business merchandizing display services in the field of clothes, shoes and headwear; organizing exhibition and sales tours for clothes, shoes and head wear; preparation of exhibits and sale displays in stores and wholesale outlets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |