USPTO serial 76576964
DEF JAM ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEF JAM ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Cellular telephone services; telephone communication services; wireless telephone services; local and long distance telephone communication services; telephone communication services, namely, prepaid telephone services via the Internet; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunications gateway services; telecommunications services, namely, ISDN services; telecommunication services, namely, wireless PBX services, wireless digital messaging services, and wireless facsimile mail services; telecommunication services, namely, personal communication services; telecommunication services, namely, voice mail services; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic mail services; electronic store-and-forward messaging services; cellular-based dispatch communication services; prepaid cellular telephone services; voice-activated cellular telephone services; emergency cellular telephone services; transmission of data via cellular communication networks; providing personal identification numbers in association with cellular telecommunications; facsimile transmissions; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; paging services; electronic and wireless transmission of messages, voices and data; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning television and television actors, film, motion picture, movie actors, theater and theatrical actors, comedy and comedians, music and musicians, performance and recording artists, musical recordings in all variety formats, music tours, sports and sports celebrities, arts and variety entertainment, travel, literature, clothing and related accessories, news and politics and politicians, goods and services all relating to the telecommunications and computer industries, and a wide range of other topics of general interest; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning television and television actors, film, motion pictures, movie actors, theater and theatrical actors, comedy and comedians, music and musicians, performance and recording artists, musical recordings in all variety formats, music tours, sports and sports celebrities, arts and variety entertainment, travel, literature, clothing and related accessories, news, politics and politicians, goods and services all relating to the telecommunications and computer industries, and a wide range of other topics of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |