Drawing for SAFE TOUCH

USPTO serial 76577440

SAFE TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VAVONESE, DANIEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seth E. Zuckerman

SETH E ZUCKERMAN SAIBER SCHLESINGER SATZ & GOLDSTEIN LLCONE GATEWAY CTR 13TH FLNEWARK, NJ 07102-5311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020mattressesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 26, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 26, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 16, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED
Jul 31, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 3, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 18, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED
Jun 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance