USPTO serial 76579083
PAINKILLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4599208Status 800
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2014
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PAINKILLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HÖFEN, AT
HÖFEN, AT
KARLSTAD, SE
Sweden, SE
Sweden, SE
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Entertainment and education computer game software, other than those that pertain to bicycles, for use on the personal computer or global computer network; entertainment and education computer game software, other than those that pertain to bicycles, that is downloadable supplied online from facilities provided on a global computer network, including web sites; interactive computer and video games, other than those that pertain to bicycles, recorded on CD-ROMs, DVDs, cartridges, pre-recorded and video cassettes; and dedicated entertainment video and computer game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor and web consoles for entertainment gaming | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | [ Clothing, namely, hats, coats, jackets, pajamas, pants, parkas, shirts, socks, sweaters and underwear; footwear, namely, slippers ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment and education computer game software services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic games that are unrelated to bicycles, the foregoing including such services provided via web sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOCH MEDIA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by PLAION GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRACER GROUP AB
- Other trademarks owned by Go-Game Outlet Aktiebolag
- Other trademarks owned by Go-Game Outlet Aktiebolag
- Other trademarks owned by DreamCatcher Interactive Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PAINKILLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 22, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 22, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| May 14, 2014 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EPGS | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE AND REQUEST TO DELETE 1B OR G/S | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |