USPTO serial 76579887
SCENAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCENAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cheltenham, Glos., GL51 6QB, GB
Cheltenham, Glos., GL51 6QB, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | therapeutic electric stimulators for the treatment of acute and chronic pain | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |