USPTO serial 76580188
LI INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3531373Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LI INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARK FOREST, IL
PARK FOREST, IL
PARK FOREST, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | BASEBALL TYPE SOFT CAPS WITH INTERNATIONAL FLAGS ON SOFT CAPS, SWEAT SUITS, JOGGING SUITS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EARE | EARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |