USPTO serial 76580310
BRITANNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRITANNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Blackpool FY2 OJF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F. Moldovanyi
JAY F MOLDOVANYI FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | dishwashers, washing machines, coffee grinders, vacuum cleaners, machines for making beverages, blade sharpening machines, namely, electric knife sharpeners, electric food blenders, bread cutting machines; machines for carpet shampooing, cleaning appliances; food preparation machines, fruit presses, electric kitchen machines, electric can openers, electric whisks; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | refrigerators, freezers; coffee machines, coffee percolators, coffee roasters; electric kettles; electric toasters; apparatus for cooking, namely, cookers, ovens and electric steamers for cooking; apparatus for beverage making; cooking rings, hobs, grills, griddles, hot plates, extractor fans and units; clothes tumble dryers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | modular kitchen furniture, namely, kitchen units made of stainless steel and/or non-metallic material for housing kitchen appliances; tables for food preparation | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | non-electric coffee percolators, non-electric coffee grinders, kettles, cookware, namely, pots and pans, kitchen utensils and containers; coffee pots; wood chopping blocks, butcher blocks, namely, cutting boards; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Britannia Living Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BRITANNIA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |