Drawing for SAV-MOR FOOD & DOLLAR

USPTO serial 76580348

SAV-MOR FOOD & DOLLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAV-MOR FOOD & DOLLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail grocery store servicesACTIVEMay 12, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2008RRGDREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT DENIED
Feb 12, 2008RFRRREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 2, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 10, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 8, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 20, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 20, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Nov 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 31, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 28, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 4, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 3, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 17, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 20, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance