USPTO serial 76580598
LAMOUCHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAMOUCHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
saint-Antonin Quebec GOL 2J0, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | FOLDING KNIVES; UTENSILS FOR VARIOUS USES,NAMELY, UTILITY KNIVES, ALL-PURPOSE KNIVES,FOLDABLE COMBINATION KNIFE AND CORK SCREW,HUNTING KNIVES, CHEESE KNIVES, BREAD KNIVES,CLEAVERS, CARVING KNIVES, CARVING FORKS,FORKS, STEAK KNIVES, POCKET KNIVES,COMBINATION POCKET KNIFE AND KEY CHAIN,COMBINATION POCKET KNIFE AND CORK SCREW,COMBINATION KNIFE AND KNIFE SHEATH SETS, KNIFE SHEATHS, KNIVES AND FORKS FOR FOOD PREPARATION, CUTLERY, NAMELY, FORKS, SPOON SAN) KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CORK SCREWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |