Drawing for T-HOTSPOT

USPTO serial 76581096

T-HOTSPOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3081191Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-HOTSPOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage, insurance claims processing; Financial services, namely, clearing of secure financial transactions through online services; financial analysis and consultation; financial information provided by electronic means; financial information processing; financial portfolio management; financial services, namely, securities consulting and safe keeping; financial sponsorship of sports, educational and entertainment programs and events; commercial lending services; monetary exchange; credit card services; telephone calling card services; electronic commerce services, namely, electronic debit and credit card transaction processing services, funds transfer and bill payment-processing services; discount brokerage services; security brokerage; brokerage in the field of insurance, stocks, commodities; custom brokerage for third parties in the field of insurance, stocks, commodities; brokerage of shares and venture capital funding services to start-up companies; brokerage of fund shares; brokerage of productive investment of funds; real estate services, namely, brokerage, management, leasing, and appraisal of real property; consulting services relating to insurance services, namely, information and brokerage of insurances; consulting services relating to bank services; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of financeSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Oct 2, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 25, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Sep 25, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2006ISICWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 5, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 19, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Aug 19, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Aug 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 5, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 5, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance