USPTO serial 76581227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Quebec J7V 1Y3, CA
Quebec J7V 1Y3, CA
Quebec J7V 1Y3, CA
MONTREAL (ANJOU) QUEBEC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
Stewart L. Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 Duke StreetSuite 100Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Delicatessen items, namely, bacon, processed beans, boiled and smoked hams, pates, potted meats, smoked sausages, fresh sausages, dry sausages, black meat pudding, vegetable pates; fish products, namely, smoked salmon and smoked fish; preserved items, namely, ratatouille, lentils, green kidney beans, tongue, and pates; grocery items, namely, jams and jellies; ready-to-eat items, namely, garden and vegetable salads; miscellaneous items, namely, gherkins, olive oil, cooking and edible oils, dry and canned legumes, processed olives ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Preserved items, namely, spaghetti sauces and tomato sauce; grocery items, namely, coffees, home-made ketchup and marinades; ] pastry items, namely, [ cookies, ] turnover, croissants, danishes, [ muffins, pies, cakes, tarts, ] and fine pastries; bakery items, namely, organic breads, leavened breads, old-fashioned breads, specialty breads, multi-grain breads, traditional breads, white breads and corn breads; french bread, namely, baguettes, whole wheat baguettes, whole wheat and white loaf bread, Parisian rolls, namely, kaiser, white rolls, whole wheat rolls, milk roll, salad roll, and submarine rolls; egg, milk and butter breads, namely, raisin bread, braided ring, Viennese baguette, chocolate Viennese bread, Viennese bread, and raisin Viennese bread; specialty breads without sourdough, namely, old-fashioned bread, onion bread, country-style baguette, cheese bread, sprouted bread, multi-grain bread, country-style Parisian bread, pumpernickel rye bread; specialty breads with sourdough, namely, sourdough baguette, rustic baguette, carrot sourdough, raisin-honey-hazelnut bread, walnut bread, black-olive sourdough, corn bread, six-cereal bread, sunflower sourdough, 100% rye sourdough, and large breads; country-style bread [ ; breadcrumbs; flour; yeast; bread dough by weight; plain croutons; nut croutons; onion croutons; olive-and-garlic croutons; ready-to-eat items and dishes, namely, sandwiches, rice, macaroni and pasta salads; confectionery items, namely, chocolates and candies; plain cake items, namely, pound cake, orange cake, chocolate cake, and marble cake; miscellaneous items, namely, honey, pasta, processed grains, processed cereals, and breakfast cereals; spices; seasonings; sea salt; vinegars; English mustard; spice loaf; nougat; meat pies ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Retail gastronomical food store featuring delicatessen items, grocery items, pastry items, bakery items, ready-to-eat items, preserved food items, confectionery items, and plain cake items ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |