CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WILD GAME

USPTO serial 76581331

WILD GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009wagering devices and computer software used therewith to enable to wagering devices to runACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 29, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 29, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
May 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance