USPTO serial 76581689
OPTIFOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIFOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-57223 Kreuztal, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER PC317 MADISON AVE STE 910NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC, HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF FOR AUTOMATING AND OPTIMIZING ROLLING PROCESSES, FOR PREPARING, TRANSPORTING AND OPTIMIZATION OF THROUGHPUT, QUALITY AND SURFACE OF ROLLED MATERIAL, NAMELY, ROLLING MILLS, RECOILERS, DECOILERS, CONVEYORS | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2004 |
| 009 | ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL APPARATUS FOR MEASURING, CONTROLLING AND REGULATING ROLLING PROCESSES, AND FOR MANAGING DETECTION, EVALUATION AND RECORDING OF DATA FROM ROLLING PROCESSES, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, DATA PROCESSORS, OPTICAL SENSORS | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |