USPTO serial 76581846
TELEBUYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELEBUYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Murphy
DAVID B MURPHY O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP610 NEWPORT CTR DR 17TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personnel placement and recruitment services; business networking services; market analysis services; providing facilities for business meetings between buyers and sellers; collection, preparation, composition, storage, processing, acquisition and provision of business information, data, statistics and indices all relating to commercial transactions; collection, preparation, composition, storage, processing, acquisition and provision of business and advertising information, data, statistics and indices all relating to general consumer goods and services; collection, processing and analysis of business information, data, statistics to match sales leads with potential buyers, and to match purchase requests with potential sellers, all in the field of general consumer goods and services; business product merchandising display services in the field of on-line consumer goods and services; product merchandising in the field of on-line consumer goods and services; and retail and wholesale shop-by-phone or shop-by-video mail order services in the field of general consumer goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing, and for the transmission of information through video communication systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely a continuing game show distributed over a communications network, namely over television, telephone and computer networks; providing facilities for game shows; providing facilities for educational conventions and providing consulting services, namely professional and nonprofessional career counseling services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical supervision and inspections in the field of product quality control | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing general purpose convention facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security surveillance services, namely the monitoring of security systems; dating services, and video dating services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Katz, Ronald A.
- Other trademarks owned by Katz, Ronald A.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TELEBUYER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |