USPTO serial 76582589
B*TWEEN PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B*TWEEN PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, books in a fiction series for and about pre-teenage girls, and children's activity books, general comic books, magazine comic strips, magazines for and about pre-teenage girls, and note books, date books, diaries, journals, computer game instruction manuals, cookbooks, gift cards, gift wrapping paper, greeting cards, arts and craft paints kits, stationery, note cards, note pads, note paper, scratch pads, scrapbooks, desktop organizers, photograph albums, printed labels, posters, printed invitations, paper tags, packaging in the nature of boxes for holding jewelry, telephone number books, trading cards, trivia cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |