Drawing for SLENDERPLUG

USPTO serial 76583421

SLENDERPLUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLENDERPLUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Sutton

PAUL J SUTTON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRICAL POWER EXTENSION CORDS HAVING MULTIPLE RECEPTACLE SOCKETS; ELECTRICAL POWER EXTENSION CORDS HAVING MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL SOCKETS WITH SURGE SUPPRESSOR CAPABILITYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 7, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 6, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 10, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance