CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BRIDGING SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

USPTO serial 76583622

BRIDGING SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIDGING SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Balaban

DAVID M KOHANE COLE SCHOTZ MEISEL FORMAN & LEONARD PA25 MAIN STHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting services in the field of medical marketing and in the field of strategic business planning for health-care and pharmaceutical professionals, for health-care and pharmaceutical organizations, and for medical-education organizationsACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of disease state researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance