Drawing for AMENITY

USPTO serial 76583652

AMENITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AMENITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald Ramenian

DONALD RAMENIAN LAW OFFICES OF DONALD RAMENIAN11355 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 300LOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bed linen, Bed sheets, Beds, Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors, Cloth wall coverings, Cotton base mixed fabrics, Cotton fabric, Coverlets, Curtain fabric, Curtains, Decorative mobiles, Decorative pencil-top ornaments, Dish cloths, Dishes {in general or specific type), Dishes and plates [not of precious metal], Duvet covers, Duvets, Fabric table runners, Fabric table toppers, Furniture, Hand towels Kitchen linens, Linen [fabric], Pillow cases, Pillow Covers, pillow shams, Pillowcases [pillow slips], Table cloths [not of paper], Table cloths not of paper, Table linen, Table linen, namely {indicate specific item, e;g;, coasters, napkins, place mats}, Textile floor mats for use in the home, Textile lined wallpaper, Textile napkins, Textile tablecloths, Textile wall hangings, Textile wall hangings, namely, cloth posters, Throws, Wallcoverings Wallpaper, Wallpaper in the nature of roomsize decorative adhesive wall coverings, Woolen cloth, Woolen fabric, Woolen blankets, Wool-cotton mixed fabricsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance