USPTO serial 76583711
LIGHTNING LAUNCHER BRICK BASH STUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTNING LAUNCHER BRICK BASH STUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pawtucket, RI
Pawtucket, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kurt R. Benson
PAUL N VANASSE HASBRO INC1027 NEWPORT AVEPAWTUCKET, RI 02862UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toy vehicles, toy vehicle playsets and accessories for use therewith | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |