CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BE HAPPY WITH HOME CONCEPT

USPTO serial 76583814

BE HAPPY WITH HOME CONCEPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE HAPPY WITH HOME CONCEPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew N. Spivak

ANDREW N SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BLVD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bedcovers, bed sheets, duvet covers, pillowcases, bedspreads, bath towels, beach towels, tablecloths and textile napkins, textile place mats, kitchen towels, oven gloves and pot holders, textile wall hangings and curtains, upholstery fabric and fabric for the manufacture of sofasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 22, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance