USPTO serial 76583923
HEDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Parr
RICHARD J PARR BERESKIN & PARRBOX 401, SCOTIA PLZ40 KING ST W STE 4000TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electronic instruments for applying very low voltages to skin contacting electrodes and for measuring and analyzing the resultant currents between electrodes, and electrode arrays, namely, sets of skin contacting electrodes, all for the screening and detection of breast diseases | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical consulting services relating to the operation of instruments for the screening and detection of breast diseases and to the assessment of results therefrom | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |