USPTO serial 76584320
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. McNamara
BRIAN J MCNAMARA FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON HARBOURWASHINGTON, DC 20007| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Handheld computers; electronic calculators having the functions of telephone books, address books, calendars, schedule books and memo books; computer software pre-recorded on magnetic tapes,integrated circuit cards, compact discs, optical discs, for use in management of databases, for use as a spreadsheet and in computer search engines, for word processing, computer aided design (CAD), information retrieval, games and utilities; computers; computer peripherals; computer keyboards; printers for computer; monitors; computer mouses; scanners; light pens; optical disc drives; modems; personal digital assistants; electronic personal organizers; digital cameras; printers for digital cameras; computer software for a personal computer for use in achieving data exchange between a personal computer and a wrist watch or a digital camera; electronic calculators; electronic label printers; cellular telephones; radio pagers; LCD television sets; vehicle navigation system consisting of computer software featuring a database of map coordinates and locations, a global positioning satellite receiver, electrical cable and documentation all sold as a unit; radios; compact disc players; audio tape recorders; video tape recorders; multimedia video projectors for transmission or reproduction of images, sound and data; visual presenters, namely, apparatus for transmission or reproduction of images and sound; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; visual apparatus for scanning, processing,transmitting and projecting images and pictures | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |