USPTO serial 76584448
ARXCIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARXCIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWTHE JENIFER BLDGWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Risk management | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Decontamination in the event of a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear event | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training services in the field of decontamination procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Inspections of premises to assess risks to persons and property; design and implementation of security plans, programs, and systems for persons, businesses, and property; nuclear, biological, and chemical response and contingency planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security and protection services, namely, consulting services in the area of personal, property, and industrial security; surveillance, namely, monitoring security systems, providing covert and overt digital photography and video imagery, monitoring telephone, radio, closed circuit television systems, and computer transmissions, covert and uniformed patrols and guard services; escort, personal protection and bodyguard services; loss and damage investigations; private investigations; hostage negotiations; counter-terrorism; security posts and stations, namely, providing vehicle and personnel checkpoints at site and building access points; providing consultation and information in the field of emergency response for communities; providing emergency incident response teams and equipment; property and premise seizures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IPS Security Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ARXCIS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ARXCIS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |