USPTO serial 76584483
GOURMET COOLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3080932Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOURMET COOLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AGILEX FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC.
UPPER SADDLE RIVER, NJ
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY ICE BLENDED, FROZEN BEVERAGES, NAMELY MOCHAS, HORCHATAS AND FLAVORED LATTES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGILEX FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Key Essentials, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Key Essentials, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GOURMET COOLERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |