USPTO serial 76584524
CSFB/TREMONT HEDGE FUND INDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CSFB/TREMONT HEDGE FUND INDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL INVESTMENT FUNDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AND UPDATING AN INDEX FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL STOCKS AND INVESTMENT FUNDS WHICH MAY BE BROKEN DOWN BY INDUSTRY SECTOR AND SUBSECTOR; BROKERAGE IN THE FIELD OF OPTIONS, FUTURES, AND OTHER DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, FUTURES, OPTIONS, SWAPS, FORWARDS ANT) STRUCTURED PRODUCTS RELATING TO AN INDEX FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL STOCKS AND INVESTMENT FUNDS | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |