Drawing for CATAPULT LEARNING

USPTO serial 76584563

CATAPULT LEARNING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATAPULT LEARNING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

Mark Harrison VENABLE LLP575 7th Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio tapes and video tapes and pre-recorded CD's featuring K-12 curriculum subject matter and health information; computer software and interactive computer software featuring instruction in K-12 curriculum subject matter and health informationACTIVE—
035Recruitment and placement of temporary healthcare personnel to work in medical facilities across the United StatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 1, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 2, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 26, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 26, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 4, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance