Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76584797?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76584797. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76584797, the listed owner(s) include: Punk Ziegel & Company.

What is USPTO serial number 76584797?

Serial number 76584797 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC?

WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC (76584797) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC?

The public record lists International Classes: 035, 036. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9

433 reviews Get Help

4.9

USPTO serial 76584797

WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Apr 5, 2004
Status date: May 26, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOODBURY VALUE FUND LLC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Punk Ziegel & Company
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Punk Ziegel & Company

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
035	business acquisitions and merger consultations	ACTIVE	May 7, 2001
036	financial services, namely, investment management, investment advice, mutual fund investment, financial advisory services, capital management services, initial and secondary public offerings, investment of funds for others; portfolio management services; financial, investment, management services related to the operation of private equity and venture capital funds; advisory services in connection with the formation and operation of investment funds and offshore funds	ACTIVE	May 7, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 24, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
May 26, 2011	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
May 26, 2011	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
May 25, 2011	LOAP	LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED	—
May 20, 2011	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 9, 2010	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jun 8, 2010	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Dec 7, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jun 5, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jan 5, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 5, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Dec 5, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jun 5, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jun 5, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 5, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jun 5, 2007	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Jun 4, 2007	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jun 4, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 20, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 6, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 4, 2007	RGIA	REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED	—
Jan 4, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 6, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Mar 16, 2006	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Mar 15, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Mar 8, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 3, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Feb 27, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 23, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 23, 2006	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Feb 23, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 10, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 29, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 29, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 27, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 19, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—