USPTO serial 76585025
TOMY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, Games and Playthings, namely, Mini-Dashboards including a Steering Wheel that Turns, a horn that Honks and a Windshield that Wipes; Toys which are Filled with Air and which thereafter Perform Selected Functions, Toy Robots, Toy Pinball Games, Toy Arcade Games; Racing Boats; Surfboards and Toy Recreational Jet Boats with Wind-up Motors;Ride-on Vehicular Toys; Toy Rattles; Bubble Balls, Music Boxes, Rocking Toys; Movable Music Boxes; Chirping Canary Toys for Cribs, Monster Figurines with Movable Appendages; Digital Screen Toy Game Centers Featuring Aiming of Laser Beams at Alien Space Craft; Digital Viewing Screens including Humming Motor Sounds; Toy Raceways including Replicas of Famous Racing Vehicles, Manually Operated Hand-Held and Table Top Games, Toy Night Lights for Infants which Play Novelty Tunes and Project Light; Radio Controlled Animal Figurines, Floatable Bath Toys, Radio-Controlled Toy Vehicles; Toy Dump Trucks; Animal Ark Games; Battery-Powered Drive Units Compatible with Multiple Configured Vehicle Casings including Helicopters and Racing Cars, Toy Trackways Featuring Movable Vehicles and Action Stations wherein Vehicles Perform Amusement Functions, Toy Musical Instruments, Hand-Held Electronic Games, Table Top Electronic Games, Magnetic Drawing Devices, including Magnetic Pens and Mechanism for Cleaning the Slates on which Marks are Made; Toy Lap Top Computers, Double Action Toy Computers for One or Two Players, Activity Cards, including Voice Guides, Sound Effects and Flashing Lights; Puzzles; Soft, Squeezing Figurine Toys; Stuffed Toys; Toys Teaching Toddlers how to Dress, Toy Airplanes; Toy Trains, Self-Propelled Water Toys, Toy Railroad Sets, Toy Dancing Dolls, Tanks for Containing Water and Various Objects which are Moved within the Tank by Water Currents; Simulated Typewriter Toys, Musical Toy Vehicles; Simulated Toy Clocks used to Teach; Toy Guns, Toy Trains, Toy Vehicles, Mechanical Toy Figurines, Soft and Squeezing Toy Figures, Toy Figures, Toy Telephones, Toy Cameras, and Stand Alone Video Output Game Machines, and Dolls | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |