USPTO serial 76585165
LIQUA DRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3043474Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIQUA DRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abraham, UT, US
Abraham, UT, US
Abraham, UT, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional meal replacement powders dried to a low temperature namely, alfalfa juice powder, barley grass juice powder, beet juice powder, blue-green algae, broccoli juice powder, carrot juice powder, colloidal mineral powder, fruit blend juice powder, lemon juice powder, oat grass juice powder, orange juice powder, raspberry juice powder, vegetable juice powder, wheat grass juice powder and grapefruit juice powder | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 1999 |
| 040 | Food processing, namely, low temperature nutritional drying services for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |