USPTO serial 76585328
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WANHUA DIST., TAIPEI, TW
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL AND METALLIC NAMEPLATES, AUTOMOTIVE LOGOS, NAMELY, LOGOS MADE OF METAL OR PLASTIC SUBSTRATE MATERIAL, WHICH ARE APPLIED TO THE INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR OF AN AUTOMOBILE TO ASSIST IN THE BRAND IDENTIFICATION OF THE AUTOMOBILE; MOULDS FOR STAMPING HARDTOOLS, NAMELY, MOULDS USED FOR STAMPING HARDENING METAL SUBSTRATES SUCH AS STEEL, ALUMINUM, BRASS, ETC; MOULDS FOR INJECTION HARDTOOLS, NAMELY, MOULDS USED FOR PLASTIC INJECTION, CONSTRUCTED WITH CHEMICALLY OR TEMPERATURE TREATED HARDENED METAL MATERIALS; STAMPING HARDTOOLS, NAMELY, MOULDS USED FOR STAMPING, CONSTRUCTED WITH CHEMICALLY OR TEMPERATURE TREATED HARDENED METAL MATERIALS; INJECTION HARDTOOLS, NAMELY, MOULDS USED FOR PLASTIC INJECTION, CONSTRUCTED WITH CHEMICALLY OR TEMPERATURE TREATED HARDENED METAL MATERIALS; PLASTIC INJECTION TOOLS, NAMELY, MOULDS USED FOR A PLASTIC INJECTION PROCESS; METAL INJECTION TOOLS, NAMELY, MOULDS USED FOR A METAL INJECTION PROCESS; FOUNDRY CHILL-MOLDS; MOLDS OF METAL FOR CASTING CERAMIC MATERIALS; METAL KEY RINGS; METAL KEY CHAINS; METALLIC ADVERTISING NAMEPLATES; NON-LUMINOUS AND NON-MECHANICAL METAL SIGNS; METAL ADDRESS PLATES, NAMELY, METAL HOUSE NUMBERS, METAL LETTERS AND NUMBERS; METALLIC INSTRUCTION PLATES, METAL COMMEMORATIVE PLATES, METAL LICENSE PLATES, METAL NAME BADGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer mouse, Computer cases, Notebook computers, Door entry card readers, Calculators, Reflective headlamp covers, Video cameras, Digital cameras, DVD players, Light reflective safety emblems, Telephone outer casings, Telephone answering machines, Facsimile machines, Cellular telephones, Remote controls, Security system control panels, Battery chargers for cellular telephones, Keypads, Electroplating machines, Luminous signs, Electric luminescent display panels, Electronic touch sensitive switches, Electric switches, Laser pointers, Decorative magnets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |