USPTO serial 76585679
D1 GRAND PRIX USA PROFESSIONAL DRIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D1 GRAND PRIX USA PROFESSIONAL DRIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tokyo 169-8588, JP
Tokyo 169-8588, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald R. Snider
RONALD R SNIDER SNIDER & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 27613WASHINGTON, DC 20038-7613UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles; Automobile bodies; Automobile bumpers; Automobile chassis; Automobile hoods; Brakes for land vehicles; Brake linings for land vehicles; Brake shoes for land vehicles; Child safety harnesses for vehicle seats; Clutches for land vehicles; Directional signals for vehicles; Drive shafts for land vehicles; Gas caps for land vehicles; Land vehicle parts, namely, fenders; Land vehicle parts, namely, drive gears; Land vehicle parts, namely, wheels; Land vehicle suspension parts, namely, coil springs; Land vehicle suspension parts, namely, leaf springs; Land vehicle suspension parts, namely, torsion/sway bars; Seat belts for use in vehicles; Spoilers for vehicle; Tires; Tires for land vehicles; Torque converters for land vehicles; Turbines for land vehicles; Valves for vehicle tires; Vehicle parts, namely, rearview mirrors; Vehicle parts, namely, shock absorbers; Suspension shock absorber for vehicle; Vehicle parts, namely, steering wheels; Vehicle parts, namely, transmissions; Vehicle parts, namely, windshield wipers; Vehicle seat covers; Vehicle seats; Wheel hubs for bicycles, motorcycles, and automobiles; Wheel rims for vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |