Drawing for EPIL HOSE

USPTO serial 76585901

EPIL HOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPIL HOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025pantyhose treated with inhibitors of hair growthACTIVEAug 17, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 8, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 13, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Apr 5, 2006CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
Feb 13, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 13, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 30, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 16, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Dec 16, 2005CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Dec 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2005CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 29, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 23, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 4, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 31, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance