USPTO serial 76586067
SPA BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPA BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | cloth bibs, and baby outfits, namely, rompers and jumpsuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |