Drawing for SPA BABY

USPTO serial 76586067

SPA BABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPA BABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025cloth bibs, and baby outfits, namely, rompers and jumpsuitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 28, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 28, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 14, 2007ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Mar 9, 2007RGTTREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED
Mar 2, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 29, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 7, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 7, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2006EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART
Jan 19, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 19, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 1, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 17, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 30, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 30, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance