Drawing for EFT INTEGRATION, INC. A GLOBAL AXCESS COMPANY

USPTO serial 76586412

EFT INTEGRATION, INC. A GLOBAL AXCESS COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFT INTEGRATION, INC. A GLOBAL AXCESS COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katharine F. Rowe

KATHARINE F ROWE SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLP50 N LAURA ST STE 2600JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, electronic transaction processing services for use in processing stored-value card, credit card and debit card transactions; electronic automated teller machine transaction terminal driving services; electronic transaction stored-value, credit and debit card management services; and online financial services to provide information to customers about their accounts and account transaction activityACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 5, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 5, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance