USPTO serial 76586519
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
Gentle Giant Studios, Inc.7511 N. San Fernando RoadBurbank, CA 91505UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | COLLECTIBLE STATUES, MINI-BUSTS AND FIGURINES MADE OF COMMON METAL | EXPIRED | Jun 30, 2002 |
| 014 | COLLECTIBLE STATUES, MINI-BUSTS AND FIGURINES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL | EXPIRED | Jun 30, 2002 |
| 020 | COLLECTIBLE STATUES, MINI-BUSTS AND FIGURINES MADE OF PLASTIC AND POLYSTONE | EXPIRED | Jun 30, 2002 |
| 028 | TOY FIGURINES | EXPIRED | Jun 30, 2002 |
| 040 | PROTOTYPE FABRICATION OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL STATUES, MINI-BUSTS, FIGURINES AND OTHER THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRODUCTS INCORPORATING LICENSED ARTWORK; ELECTORNIC SCANNING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS FOR OTHERS | EXPIRED | Dec 31, 1996 |
| 042 | DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL STATUES, MINI-BUSTS, FIGURINES AND OTHER THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRODUCTS | EXPIRED | Dec 31, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |