Drawing for WAVECREST

USPTO serial 76586687

WAVECREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WAVECREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Instructional tapes, compact disks and DVDs in the field of pain management and pain management consultingACTIVEMay 22, 2007
016Instructional materials, namely books in the field of pain management and pain management consultingACTIVEMay 22, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 31, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 31, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 18, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jul 3, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 3, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 1, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
May 10, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Nov 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Nov 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance