USPTO serial 76587301
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
BARTH X DEROSA DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1875 EYE STREETSUITE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance underwriting and administration in the field of life, disability, dental, long term care and Medicare supplement products; insurance claims processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, workshops, and seminars in the field of insurance and annuities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |